From fa482834ea1a30eff056dbf0f36a6f3262460a08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Jakma Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:51:21 +0000 Subject: HACKING.tex: Change to a LaTeX version of HACKING * configure.ac: Check for latexmk and pdflatex * Makefile.am: Add a conditional target to build HACKING.pdf, as a convenience * HACKING.tex: A slightly more structured HACKING, is readable on its own. * HACKING: removed --- HACKING.tex | 462 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 462 insertions(+) create mode 100644 HACKING.tex (limited to 'HACKING.tex') diff --git a/HACKING.tex b/HACKING.tex new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a49113fb --- /dev/null +++ b/HACKING.tex @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@ +%% -*- mode: text; -*- +%% $QuaggaId: Format:%an, %ai, %h$ $ + +\documentclass[oneside]{article} +\usepackage{parskip} +\usepackage[bookmarks,colorlinks=true]{hyperref} + +\title{Conventions for working on Quagga} + +\begin{document} +\maketitle + +This is a living document. Suggestions for updates, via the +\href{http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev}{quagga-dev list}, +are welcome. + +\tableofcontents + +\section{GUIDELINES FOR HACKING ON QUAGGA} +\label{sec:guidelines} + + +GNU coding standards apply. Indentation follows the result of +invoking GNU indent (as of 2.2.8a) with no arguments. Note that this +uses tabs instead of spaces where possible for leading whitespace, and +assumes that tabs are every 8 columns. Do not attempt to redefine the +location of tab stops. Note also that some indentation does not +follow GNU style. This is a historical accident, and we generally +only clean up whitespace when code is unmaintainable due to whitespace +issues, to minimise merging conflicts. + +For GNU emacs, use indentation style ``gnu''. + +For Vim, use the following lines (note that tabs are at 8, and that +softtabstop sets the indentation level): + +set tabstop=8 +set softtabstop=2 +set shiftwidth=2 +set noexpandtab + +Be particularly careful not to break platforms/protocols that you +cannot test. + +New code should have good comments, which explain why the code is correct. +Changes to existing code should in many cases upgrade the comments when +necessary for a reviewer to conclude that the change has no unintended +consequences. + +Each file in the Git repository should have a git format-placeholder (like +an RCS Id keyword), somewhere very near the top, commented out appropriately +for the file type. The placeholder used for Quagga (replacing with +\$) is: + + \verb|$QuaggaId: Format:%an, %ai, %h $| + +See line 2 of HACKING.tex, the source for this document, for an example. + +This placeholder string will be expanded out by the `git archive' commands, +wihch is used to generate the tar archives for snapshots and releases. + +Please document fully the proper use of a new function in the header file +in which it is declared. And please consult existing headers for +documentation on how to use existing functions. In particular, please consult +these header files: + +\begin{description} + \item{lib/log.h} logging levels and usage guidance + \item{[more to be added]} +\end{description} + +If changing an exported interface, please try to deprecate the interface in +an orderly manner. If at all possible, try to retain the old deprecated +interface as is, or functionally equivalent. Make a note of when the +interface was deprecated and guard the deprecated interface definitions in +the header file, ie: + +\begin{verbatim} +/* Deprecated: 20050406 */ +#if !defined(QUAGGA_NO_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES) +#warning "Using deprecated (interface(s)|function(s))" +... +#endif /* QUAGGA_NO_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES */ +\end{verbatim} + +This is to ensure that the core Quagga sources do not use the deprecated +interfaces (you should update Quagga sources to use new interfaces, if +applicable), while allowing external sources to continue to build. +Deprecated interfaces should be excised in the next unstable cycle. + +Note: If you wish, you can test for GCC and use a function +marked with the 'deprecated' attribute. However, you must provide the +warning for other compilers. + +If changing or removing a command definition, \emph{ensure} that you +properly deprecate it - use the \_DEPRECATED form of the appropriate DEFUN +macro. This is \emph{critical}. Even if the command can no longer +function, you \emph{MUST} still implement it as a do-nothing stub. + +Failure to follow this causes grief for systems administrators, as an +upgrade may cause daemons to fail to start because of unrecognised commands. +Deprecated commands should be excised in the next unstable cycle. A list of +deprecated commands should be collated for each release. + +See also section~\ref{sec:dll-versioning} below regarding SHARED LIBRARY +VERSIONING. + + +\section{COMPILE-TIME CONDITIONAL CODE} + +Please think very carefully before making code conditional at compile time, +as it increases maintenance burdens and user confusion. In particular, +please avoid gratuitious --enable-\ldots switches to the configure script - +typically code should be good enough to be in Quagga, or it shouldn't be +there at all. + +When code must be compile-time conditional, try have the compiler make it +conditional rather than the C pre-processor - so that it will still be +checked by the compiler, even if disabled. I.e. this: + +\begin{verbatim} + if (SOME_SYMBOL) + frobnicate(); +\end{verbatim} + +rather than: + +\begin{verbatim} + #ifdef SOME_SYMBOL + frobnicate (); + #endif /* SOME_SYMBOL */ +\end{verbatim} + +Note that the former approach requires ensuring that SOME\_SYMBOL will be +defined (watch your AC\_DEFINEs). + + +\section{COMMIT MESSAGES} + +The commit message requirements are: + +\begin{itemize} + +\item The message \emph{MUST} provide a suitable one-line summary followed + by a blank line as the very first line of the message, in the form: + + \verb|topic: high-level, one line summary| + + Where topic would tend to be name of a subdirectory, and/or daemon, unless + there's a more suitable topic (e.g. 'build'). This topic is used to + organise change summaries in release announcements. + +\item It should have a suitable "body", which tries to address the + following areas, so as to help reviewers and future browsers of the + code-base understand why the change is correct (note also the code + comment requirements): + + \begin{itemize} + + \item The motivation for the change (does it fix a bug, if so which? + add a feature?) + + \item The general approach taken, and trade-offs versus any other + approaches. + + \item Any testing undertaken or other information affecting the confidence + that can be had in the change. + + \item Information to allow reviewers to be able to tell which specific + changes to the code are intended (and hence be able to spot any accidental + unintended changes). + + \end{itemize} +\end{itemize} + +The one-line summary must be limited to 54 characters, and all other +lines to 72 characters. + +Commit message bodies in the Quagga project have typically taken the +following form: + +\begin{itemize} +\item An optional introduction, describing the change generally. +\item A short description of each specific change made, preferably: + \begin{itemize} \item file by file + \begin{itemize} \item function by function (use of "ditto", or globs is + allowed) + \end{itemize} + \end{itemize} +\end{itemize} + +Contributors are strongly encouraged to follow this form. + +This itemised commit messages allows reviewers to have confidence that the +author has self-reviewed every line of the patch, as well as providing +reviewers a clear index of which changes are intended, and descriptions for +them (C-to-english descriptions are not desireable - some discretion is +useful). For short patches, a per-function/file break-down may be +redundant. For longer patches, such a break-down may be essential. A +contrived example (where the general discussion is obviously somewhat +redundant, given the one-line summary): + +\begin{quote}\begin{verbatim} +zebra: Enhance frob FSM to detect loss of frob + +Add a new DOWN state to the frob state machine to allow the barinator to +detect loss of frob. + +* frob.h: (struct frob) Add DOWN state flag. +* frob.c: (frob\_change) set/clear DOWN appropriately on state change. +* bar.c: (barinate) Check frob for DOWN state. +\end{verbatim}\end{quote} + +Please have a look at the git commit logs to get a feel for what the norms +are. + +Note that the commit message format follows git norms, so that ``git +log --oneline'' will have useful output. + +\section{HACKING THE BUILD SYSTEM} + +If you change or add to the build system (configure.ac, any Makefile.am, +etc.), try to check that the following things still work: + +\begin{itemize} +\item make dist +\item resulting dist tarball builds +\item out-of-tree builds +\end{itemize} + +The quagga.net site relies on make dist to work to generate snapshots. It +must work. Common problems are to forget to have some additional file +included in the dist, or to have a make rule refer to a source file without +using the srcdir variable. + + +\section{RELEASE PROCEDURE} + +\begin{itemize} +\item Tag the apppropriate commit with a release tag (follow existing + conventions). + + [This enables recreating the release, and is just good CM practice.] + +\item Create a fresh tar archive of the quagga.net repository, and do a test + build: + + \begin{verbatim} + git-clone git:///code.quagga.net/quagga.git quagga + git-archive --remote=git://code.quagga.net/quagga.git \ + --prefix=quagga-release/ master | tar -xf - + cd quagga-release + + autoreconf -i + ./configure + make + make dist + \end{verbatim} +\end{itemize} + +The tarball which `make dist' creates is the tarball to be released! The +git-archive step ensures you're working with code corresponding to that in +the official repository, and also carries out keyword expansion. If any +errors occur, move tags as needed and start over from the fresh checkouts. +Do not append to tarballs, as this has produced non-standards-conforming +tarballs in the past. + +See also: \url{http://wiki.quagga.net/index.php/Main/Processes} + +[TODO: collation of a list of deprecated commands. Possibly can be scripted +to extract from vtysh/vtysh\_cmd.c] + + +\section{TOOL VERSIONS} + +Require versions of support tools are listed in INSTALL.quagga.txt. +Required versions should only be done with due deliberation, as it can +cause environments to no longer be able to compile quagga. + + +\section{SHARED LIBRARY VERSIONING} +\label{sec:dll-versioning} + +[this section is at the moment just gdt's opinion] + +Quagga builds several shared libaries (lib/libzebra, ospfd/libospf, +ospfclient/libsopfapiclient). These may be used by external programs, +e.g. a new routing protocol that works with the zebra daemon, or +ospfapi clients. The libtool info pages (node Versioning) explain +when major and minor version numbers should be changed. These values +are set in Makefile.am near the definition of the library. If you +make a change that requires changing the shared library version, +please update Makefile.am. + +libospf exports far more than it should, and is needed by ospfapi +clients. Only bump libospf for changes to functions for which it is +reasonable for a user of ospfapi to call, and please err on the side +of not bumping. + +There is no support intended for installing part of zebra. The core +library libzebra and the included daemons should always be built and +installed together. + + +\section{GIT COMMIT SUBMISSION} +\label{sec:git-submission} + +The preferred method for submitting changes is to provide git commits via a +publically-accessible git repository, which the maintainers can easily pull. + +The commits should be in a branch based off the Quagga.net master - a +"feature branch". Ideally there should be no commits to this branch other +than those in master, and those intended to be submitted. However, merge +commits to this branch from the Quagga master are permitted, though strongly +discouraged - use another (potentially local and throw-away) branch to test +merge with the latest Quagga master. + +Recommended practice is to keep different logical sets of changes on +separate branches - "topic" or "feature" branches. This allows you to still +merge them together to one branch (potentially local and/or "throw-away") +for testing or use, while retaining smaller, independent branches that are +easier to merge. + +All content guidelines in section \ref{sec:patch-submission}, PATCH +SUBMISSION apply. + + +\section{PATCH SUBMISSION} +\label{sec:patch-submission} + +\begin{itemize} + +\item For complex changes, contributors are strongly encouraged to first + start a design discussion on the quagga-dev list \emph{before} + starting any coding. + +\item Send a clean diff against the 'master' branch of the quagga.git + repository, in unified diff format, preferably with the '-p' argument to + show C function affected by any chunk, and with the -w and -b arguments to + minimise changes. E.g: + + git diff -up mybranch..remotes/quagga.net/master + + It is preferable to use git format-patch, and even more preferred to + publish a git repository (see GIT COMMIT SUBMISSION, section + \ref{sec:git-submission}). + + If not using git format-patch, Include the commit message in the email. + +\item After a commit, code should have comments explaining to the reviewer + why it is correct, without reference to history. The commit message + should explain why the change is correct. + +\item Include NEWS entries as appropriate. + +\item Include only one semantic change or group of changes per patch. + +\item Do not make gratuitous changes to whitespace. See the w and b arguments + to diff. + +\item Changes should be arranged so that the least contraversial and most + trivial are first, and the most complex or more contraversial are + last. This will maximise how many the Quagga maintainers can merge, + even if some other commits need further work. + +\item Providing a unit-test is strongly encouraged. Doing so will make it + much easier for maintainers to have confidence that they will be able + to support your change. + +\item New code should be arranged so that it easy to verify and test. E.g. + stateful logic should be separated out from functional logic as much as + possible: wherever possible, move complex logic out to smaller helper + functions which access no state other than their arguments. + +\item State on which platforms and with what daemons the patch has been + tested. Understand that if the set of testing locations is small, + and the patch might have unforeseen or hard to fix consequences that + there may be a call for testers on quagga-dev, and that the patch + may be blocked until test results appear. + + If there are no users for a platform on quagga-dev who are able and + willing to verify -current occasionally, that platform may be + dropped from the "should be checked" list. + +\end{itemize} + +\section{PATCH APPLICATION} + +\begin{itemize} + +\item Only apply patches that meet the submission guidelines. + +\item If the patch might break something, issue a call for testing on the + mailinglist. + +\item Give an appropriate commit message (see above), and use the --author + argument to git-commit, if required, to ensure proper attribution (you + should still be listed as committer) + +\item Immediately after commiting, double-check (with git-log and/or gitk). + If there's a small mistake you can easily fix it with `git commit + --amend ..' + +\item When merging a branch, always use an explicit merge commit. Giving + --no-ff ensures a merge commit is created which documents ``this human + decided to merge this branch at this time''. +\end{itemize} + +\section{STABLE PLATFORMS AND DAEMONS} + +The list of platforms that should be tested follow. This is a list +derived from what quagga is thought to run on and for which +maintainers can test or there are people on quagga-dev who are able +and willing to verify that -current does or does not work correctly. + +\begin{itemize} + \item BSD (Free, Net or Open, any platform) + \item GNU/Linux (any distribution, i386) + \item Solaris (strict alignment, any platform) + \item future: NetBSD/sparc64 +\end{itemize} + +The list of daemons that are thought to be stable and that should be +tested are: + +\begin{itemize} + \item zebra + \item bgpd + \item ripd + \item ospfd + \item ripngd +\end{itemize} +Daemons which are in a testing phase are + +\begin{itemize} + \item ospf6d + \item isisd + \item watchquagga +\end{itemize} + +\section{IMPORT OR UPDATE VENDOR SPECIFIC ROUTING PROTOCOLS} + +The source code of Quagga is based on two vendors: + + \verb|zebra_org| (\url{http://www.zebra.org/}) + \verb|isisd_sf| (\url{http://isisd.sf.net/}) + +To import code from further sources, e.g. for archival purposes without +necessarily having to review and/or fix some changeset, create a branch from +`master': + +\begin{verbatim} + git checkout -b archive/foo master + + git commit -a "Joe Bar " + git push quagga archive/foo +\end{verbatim} + +presuming `quagga' corresponds to a file in your .git/remotes with +configuration for the appropriate Quagga.net repository. + +\end{document} -- cgit v1.2.1