From a8e474a598ed01591fd3814eee5f5b6a909e4f59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Troxel Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:22:00 -0400 Subject: infrastructure: Whitespace cleanup. HACKING: Whitespace changes only. --- HACKING | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'HACKING') diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING index ca3ad52e..55c03435 100644 --- a/HACKING +++ b/HACKING @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Contents: * STABLE PLATFORMS AND DAEMONS * IMPORT OR UPDATE VENDOR SPECIFIC ROUTING PROTOCOLS + GUIDELINES FOR HACKING ON QUAGGA [this is a draft in progress] @@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ release. See also below regarding SHARED LIBRARY VERSIONING. + COMPILE-TIME CONDITIONAL CODE Please think very carefully before making code conditional at compile time, @@ -121,6 +123,7 @@ rather than: Note that the former approach requires ensuring that SOME_SYMBOL will be defined (watch your AC_DEFINEs). + COMMIT MESSAGES The commit message should provide: @@ -141,14 +144,14 @@ The commit message should provide: to provide a short description of the general intent of the patch, in terms of the problem it solves and how it achieves it, to help reviewers -understand. +understand. The one-line summary must be limited to 54 characters, and all other lines to 72 characters. The reason for such itemised commit messages is to encourage the author to self-review every line of the patch, as well as provide reviewers an index -of which changes are intended, along with a short description for each. +of which changes are intended, along with a short description for each. Some discretion is obviously required. A C-to-english description is not desireable. For short patches, a per-function/file break-down may be redundant. For longer patches, such a break-down may be essential. @@ -159,7 +162,7 @@ given the one-line summary): zebra: Enhance frob FSM to detect loss of frob * (general) Add a new DOWN state to the frob state machine - to allow the barinator to detect loss of frob. + to allow the barinator to detect loss of frob. * frob.h: (struct frob) Add DOWN state flag. * frob.c: (frob_change) set/clear DOWN appropriately on state change. * bar.c: (barinate) Check frob for DOWN state. @@ -174,13 +177,14 @@ etc.), try to check that the following things still work: - make dist - resulting dist tarball builds - - out-of-tree builds + - out-of-tree builds The quagga.net site relies on make dist to work to generate snapshots. It must work. Common problems are to forget to have some additional file included in the dist, or to have a make rule refer to a source file without using the srcdir variable. + RELEASE PROCEDURE * Tag the apppropriate commit with a release tag (follow existing @@ -203,7 +207,7 @@ RELEASE PROCEDURE The tarball which 'make dist' creates is the tarball to be released! The git-archive step ensures you're working with code corresponding to that in the official repository, and also carries out keyword expansion. If any -errors occur, move tags as needed and start over from the fresh checkouts. +errors occur, move tags as needed and start over from the fresh checkouts. Do not append to tarballs, as this has produced non-standards-conforming tarballs in the past. @@ -246,9 +250,9 @@ installed together. PATCH SUBMISSION * Send a clean diff against the 'master' branch of the quagga.git - repository, in unified diff format, preferably with the '-p' argument to + repository, in unified diff format, preferably with the '-p' argument to show C function affected by any chunk, and with the -w and -b arguments to - minimise changes. E.g: + minimise changes. E.g: git diff -up mybranch..remotes/quagga.net/master @@ -256,7 +260,7 @@ PATCH SUBMISSION * Not doing so is a definite hindrance to patch application. -* Include NEWS entries as appropriate. +* Include NEWS entries as appropriate. * Please, please include an appropriate commit message with any emailed patches. Doing so makes it easier to review a patch, and apply it. -- cgit v1.2.1