From 9db047fcb1bedcf1a5a1962e49aa70f48f969b96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Franke Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:04:44 +0000 Subject: zebra: make if_subnet_delete a bit more strict Enhance if_subnet_delete so it will complain about improper use. Also, fix one occurence of improper use where it was called for IPv6 as well. Signed-off-by: Christian Franke Signed-off-by: David Lamparter --- zebra/interface.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'zebra/interface.c') diff --git a/zebra/interface.c b/zebra/interface.c index 3578b790..baa7ab63 100644 --- a/zebra/interface.c +++ b/zebra/interface.c @@ -161,11 +161,26 @@ if_subnet_delete (struct interface *ifp, struct connected *ifc) /* Get address derived subnet node. */ rn = route_node_lookup (zebra_if->ipv4_subnets, ifc->address); if (! (rn && rn->info)) - return -1; + { + zlog_warn("Trying to remove an address from an unknown subnet." + " (please report this bug)"); + return -1; + } route_unlock_node (rn); /* Untie address from subnet's address list. */ addr_list = rn->info; + + /* Deleting an address that is not registered is a bug. + * In any case, we shouldn't decrement the lock counter if the address + * is unknown. */ + if (!listnode_lookup(addr_list, ifc)) + { + zlog_warn("Trying to remove an address from a subnet where it is not" + " currently registered. (please report this bug)"); + return -1; + } + listnode_delete (addr_list, ifc); route_unlock_node (rn); -- cgit v1.2.1