diff options
author | paul <paul> | 2003-04-19 00:11:28 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | paul <paul> | 2003-04-19 00:11:28 +0000 |
commit | 5f37d86f837e666f7915ee6dc971e44e495d41f3 (patch) | |
tree | a31e657803f2600dd1c0aac533e2087de8055df2 /ospf6d/ospf6_lsa.c | |
parent | c2191eaee5686cdcb54c5f26afffa4a029c691de (diff) |
From: Israel Keys <ikeys@agile.tv>
Subject: [zebra 18677] zebra initialisation bug and patch
Hi All,
I have found a bug in zebra that prevents its routing table and
interface database from being initialised properly. The problem occurs
when a request is made via the netlink socket but the kernel produces a
EWOULDBLOCK/EAGAIN when the result is trying to be retrieved via a
recvmsg(). Zebra does not do anything about this and continues to
function (with an empty routing table and interface list) as if nothing
has happened. With no such information the routing protocol dosn't work!
Two functions are called during the initialisation of Zebra:
interface_lookup_netlink() and netlink_route_read() - obtaining the
interfaces and routing table from the kernel respectively. These are the
only time these functions are called.
These functions, interface_lookup_netlink() and netlink_route_read(),
use netlink_parse_info() to recieve the data from the netlink socket.
The problem is, netlink_parse_info() returns (without error) when its
call to recvmsg() results in an errno EWOULDBLOCK/EAGAIN. This behaviour
is expected by other funtions calling netlink_parse_info() -
netlink_parse_info is simply recalled at a later stage. However, on
initialisation it is never recalled.
Since zebra is expected to nothing else during initialisation it was
easiest to temporarily change the netlink socket to BLOCK and wait
indefinently until the kernel responds with the required information.
Attached is a patch with these changes.
Comments and questions are welcome.
Please inform me if this patch is added to the Zebra source.
--israel
Diffstat (limited to 'ospf6d/ospf6_lsa.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions