summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ospfd/ospf_route.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJR Rivers <jrrivers@cumulusnetworks.com>2012-09-24 17:26:46 +0000
committerDavid Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>2012-10-25 10:15:58 -0700
commit8fc9e007ee752a982fe47311702d7ff3b9c5b5cd (patch)
tree8dd5ef95e303d34f1045afe538f44a07dab017d3 /ospfd/ospf_route.c
parentd8a4e42b7d19a87eacc00c825e913907a58f39ee (diff)
ospfd: blackhole route removal for area range
ISSUE When an area range is created in which there the sub-area has routes that are smaller than the range, an ABR creates a blackhole route to cover the range. When the range is removed, the blackhole route is not removed. --A----B----C--- B is an ABR with A in area 1 and C in area 0. If A advertises `10.2.0.0/30` and `10.2.0.4/30` and B is configured with `area 0.0.0.1 range 10.2.0.0/29` a blackhole is created on B (`blackhole 10.2.0.0/29 proto zebra`). When the area/range is removed via the command line, the blackhole remains in existence even though the "range" route is removed from area 0 and the individual routes are propagated. PATCH The reason for this behavior is that, prior to this patch, the range is deleted from the area's list, so when ospf_abr_manage_discard_routes() gets called, there is nothing to clean up. The patch removes the discard route as part of the processing of the command line (ospf_area_range_unset()). Signed-off-by: JR Rivers <jrrivers@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'ospfd/ospf_route.c')
-rw-r--r--ospfd/ospf_route.c50
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_route.c b/ospfd/ospf_route.c
index a5d6d18c..c3acba34 100644
--- a/ospfd/ospf_route.c
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_route.c
@@ -954,6 +954,10 @@ ospf_add_discard_route (struct route_table *rt, struct ospf_area *area,
ospf_route_free (rn->info);
}
+ if (IS_DEBUG_OSPF_EVENT)
+ zlog_debug ("ospf_add_discard_route(): "
+ "adding %s/%d", inet_ntoa (p->prefix), p->prefixlen);
+
new_or = ospf_route_new ();
new_or->type = OSPF_DESTINATION_DISCARD;
new_or->id.s_addr = 0;
@@ -969,8 +973,52 @@ ospf_add_discard_route (struct route_table *rt, struct ospf_area *area,
}
void
-ospf_delete_discard_route (struct prefix_ipv4 *p)
+ospf_delete_discard_route (struct route_table *rt, struct prefix_ipv4 *p)
{
+ struct route_node *rn;
+ struct ospf_route *or;
+
+ if (IS_DEBUG_OSPF_EVENT)
+ zlog_debug ("ospf_delete_discard_route(): "
+ "deleting %s/%d", inet_ntoa (p->prefix), p->prefixlen);
+
+ rn = route_node_lookup (rt, (struct prefix*)p);
+
+ if (rn == NULL)
+ {
+ if (IS_DEBUG_OSPF_EVENT)
+ zlog_debug("ospf_delete_discard_route(): no route found");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ or = rn->info;
+
+ if (or->path_type == OSPF_PATH_INTRA_AREA)
+ {
+ if (IS_DEBUG_OSPF_EVENT)
+ zlog_debug ("ospf_delete_discard_route(): "
+ "an intra-area route exists");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (or->type != OSPF_DESTINATION_DISCARD)
+ {
+ if (IS_DEBUG_OSPF_EVENT)
+ zlog_debug ("ospf_delete_discard_route(): "
+ "not a discard entry");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* free the route entry and the route node */
+ ospf_route_free (rn->info);
+
+ rn->info = NULL;
+ route_unlock_node (rn);
+ route_unlock_node (rn);
+
+ /* remove the discard entry from the rib */
ospf_zebra_delete_discard(p);
+
+ return;
}