summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ports
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorpaul <paul>2003-01-18 00:12:02 +0000
committerpaul <paul>2003-01-18 00:12:02 +0000
commit09e4efdcb22ac13af3f6e3a38158871ed140e5e0 (patch)
tree5fa509af429208262d719c04a195f5cd58e49ffa /ports
parent2d59836a4fb16e2471560a47da7e5f75779c5807 (diff)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:28:45 +0900
From: Masahiko Endo <endo@suri.co.jp> Reply-To: zebra@zebra.org To: zebra@zebra.org Cc: kunihiro@zebra.org, yokota@kddlabs.co.jp Subject: [zebra 16823] [PATCH] Bugfix and new feature in Opaque-LSA handling. ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- * ----- Changes 2002.12.20 1. Bug fixes 1.1 When an opaque LSA is being removed from (or added to) the LSDB, it does not mean a change in network topology. Therefore, SPF recalculation should not be triggered in that case. There was an assertion failure problem "assert (rn && rn->info)" inside the function "ospf_ase_incremental_update()", because the upper function "ospf_lsa_maxage_walker_remover()" called it when a type-11 opaque LSA is removed due to MaxAge. 1.2 Type-9 LSA is defined to have "link-local" flooding scope. In the Database exchange procedure with a new neighbor, a type-9 LSA was added in the database summary of a DD message, even if the link is different from the one that have bound to. 2. Feature enhancements 2.1 Though a "wildcard" concept to handle type-9/10/11 LSAs altogether has introduced about a year ago, it was only a symbol definition and actual handling mechanism was not implemented. Now it works.
Diffstat (limited to 'ports')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions