diff options
author | gdt <gdt> | 2004-11-17 17:59:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | gdt <gdt> | 2004-11-17 17:59:52 +0000 |
commit | 996ac2dcb3dc40d1ba4192c119e252dbb84390f0 (patch) | |
tree | a0f6e9e41acb3f43234d607a18e3a2586d469685 | |
parent | 0cdb8dd2c42b9e71c320ac155c065e64cb8c89e4 (diff) |
add note about alignment in LS updates due to opaque LSAs.
-rw-r--r-- | ospfd/OSPF-ALIGNMENT.txt | 119 |
1 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ospfd/OSPF-ALIGNMENT.txt b/ospfd/OSPF-ALIGNMENT.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dac6182f --- /dev/null +++ b/ospfd/OSPF-ALIGNMENT.txt @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +$Id: OSPF-ALIGNMENT.txt,v 1.1 2004/11/17 17:59:52 gdt Exp $ + +Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com> +2004-11-17 + +The OSPF specification (RFC2328) and the OSPF Opaque LSA specification +(RFC2370) are ambiguous about LSAs whose data section is not an +integral multiple of 4 octets. This note examines the issue and +proposes clarifications to ensure interoperability. + +RFC2328 does not specify that LSA lengths be a multiple of 4. +It does not require that LSAs in update packets be aligned. +However, all structures defined by RFC2328 are multiples of 4, and +thus update packets with those structures must be aligned. +LSA length is defined in Appendix A.4 as + + length + The length in bytes of the LSA. This includes the 20 byte LSA + header. + +RFC2370 defines Opaque LSAs, which are intended to contain arbitrary +data: + + This memo defines enhancements to the OSPF protocol to support a new + class of link-state advertisements (LSA) called Opaque LSAs. Opaque + LSAs provide a generalized mechanism to allow for the future + extensibility of OSPF. Opaque LSAs consist of a standard LSA header + followed by application-specific information. The information field + may be used directly by OSPF or by other applications. Standard OSPF + link-state database flooding mechanisms are used to distribute Opaque + LSAs to all or some limited portion of the OSPF topology. + + +Later, 2370 says: + + Opaque LSAs contain some number of octets (of application-specific + data) padded to 32-bit alignment. + +This can be interpreted in several ways: + +A) The payload may be any number of octets, and the length field +reflects the payload length (e.g. length 23 for 3 octets of payload), +but there are padding octets following the LSA in packets, so that the +next LSA starts on a 4-octet boundary. (This approach is common in +the BSD user/kernel interface.) + +B) The payload must be a multiple of 4 octets, so that the length is a +multiple of 4 octets. This corresponds to an implementation that +treats an Opaque LSA publish request that is not a multiple of 4 +octets as an error. + +C) The payload can be any number of octets, but padding is added and +included in the length field. This interpretation corresponds to an +OSPF implementation that accepts a publish request for an Opaque LSA +that is not a multiple of 4 octets. This interpretation is +nonsensical, because it claims to represent arbitrary lengths, but +does not actually do so --- the receiver cannot distinguish padding +from supplied data. + +D) Accept according to A, and transmit according to B. + +Option A arguably violates RFC 2328, which doesn't say anything about +adding padding (A.3.5 shows a diagram of adjacent LSAs which are shown +as all multiples of 4). This option is thus likely to lead to a lack +of interoperability. + +Option B restricts what data can be represented as an Opaque LSA, but +probably not in a serious way. It is likely to lead to +interoperability in that the complex case of non-multiple-of-4 lengths +will not arise. + +However, an implementation that follows A and emits an LSA with +payload length not a multiple of 4 will not interoperate with an +Option B implementation. + +Given that all known and documented uses of Opaque LSAs seem to be +multiples of 4 octets, we choose Option B as the clarification. + +CLARIFYING TEXT + +In RFC2328: + +In section A.4, add a second sentence about length: + + length + The length in bytes of the LSA. This includes the 20 byte LSA + header. The length must be an integral multiple of 4 bytes. + +Add to the list in Section 13: + + Verify that the length of the LSA is a multiple of 4 bytes. If + not, discard the entire Link State Update Packet. + +In RFC2380: + +Change text: + + Opaque LSAs contain some number of octets (of application-specific + data) padded to 32-bit alignment. + +to: + + Opaque LSAs contain some a number of octets (of + application-specific data). The number of octets must be a + multiple of four. + + +HOW THIS ISSUE AROSE + +At BBN, we use Opaque LSAs to exchange data among routers; the format +of the data is naturally aligned to 4 bytes, and thus does not raise +this issue. We created a test program to publish Opaque data via IPC +to the OSPF daemon (quagga), and this program accepts strings on the +command line to publish. We then used this test program to publish +software version strings. Quagga's ospfd then crashed on a +NetBSD/sparc64 machine with an alignment fault, because the odd-length +LSAs were marshalled into a link-state update packet with no padding. +While this behavior was a clear violation of RFC2380, it was not clear +how to remedy the problem. |