summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--ospfd/ChangeLog4
-rw-r--r--ospfd/ospf_nsm.c16
2 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ospfd/ChangeLog b/ospfd/ChangeLog
index 7486b073..e3805c82 100644
--- a/ospfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/ospfd/ChangeLog
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
* ospf_nsm.c: (nsm_should_adj) New function, just consolidate the
10.4 adjacency check from nsm_twoway_received/nsm_adj_ok.
(nsm_twoway_received/nsm_adj_ok) Use former.
+ (ospf_nsm_event) Don't allow action functions to change
+ next_state if the NSM tables do not indicate next_state is
+ conditional, log warning if one tries - existing code
+ appears fine though.
2006-06-30 Andrew J. Schorr <ajschorr@alumni.princeton.edu>
diff --git a/ospfd/ospf_nsm.c b/ospfd/ospf_nsm.c
index c5a55367..73ed088f 100644
--- a/ospfd/ospf_nsm.c
+++ b/ospfd/ospf_nsm.c
@@ -878,6 +878,22 @@ ospf_nsm_event (struct thread *thread)
if (! next_state)
next_state = NSM [nbr->state][event].next_state;
+ else if (NSM [nbr->state][event].next_state != NSM_DependUpon)
+ {
+ /* There's a mismatch between the FSM tables and what an FSM
+ * action/state-change function returned. State changes which
+ * do not have conditional/DependUpon next-states should not
+ * try set next_state.
+ */
+ zlog_warn ("NSM[%s:%s]: %s (%s): "
+ "Warning: action tried to change next_state to %s",
+ IF_NAME (oi), inet_ntoa (nbr->router_id),
+ LOOKUP (ospf_nsm_state_msg, nbr->state),
+ ospf_nsm_event_str [event],
+ LOOKUP (ospf_nsm_state_msg, next_state));
+
+ next_state = NSM [nbr->state][event].next_state;
+ }
if (IS_DEBUG_OSPF (nsm, NSM_EVENTS))
zlog_debug ("NSM[%s:%s]: %s (%s)", IF_NAME (oi),